alt Hacker News> lambda expressions can only be passed to template functions
> there is no way to explicitly refer to the compiler-generated name for the lambda type.
"Voldemort" types. While intellectually I get the explanation for why C++/Rust lambdas are like this, I still strongly dislike them. Occasionally being unable to even articulate what something is feels like a failure in language design.
C recently got type inference via the "auto" keyword and it seemed like almost immediately there was a proposal to add voldemort types to the language.
I know it's not the same, but you can "kind of" name them by using them as a template parameter, then, scoped to the template, you can reference them under the template parameter name.
Anyway, I don't see it mentioned anywhere in this discussion, but imo the area where c++ lambdas shine is the way they interact with copy constructors and move constructors.