alt Hacker NewsNo, it was just plainly a bad idea.
It removed the physical function keys, which is a huge no-no overall. The initial version also lacked a physical Esc key.
But the bigger issue was the notion that it was created in spite of having a conventional touchscreen on the laptop instead. Apple has been rather weird, petty, and immature about putting touch on Macs, stemming from Jobs' ill-conceived "your arm gets tired if you have touch on a laptop, boo hoo" speech which has never been correct and continues to be misconstrued as scientific when it isn't.
Luckily, the market soundly rejected the Touch Bar and Apple is now due to release Macs with proper touch on them. It took a while, but this era of pretentiousness is over.
Replies
The main objection to touch on MacBooks so far is the software, by far. Apple may now, just about, be in a place where they could support it due to Catalyst, Apple Silicon and some of the latest UI changes in Tahoe. Back then, when they released the touch bar, they weren’t even close. Neither was Windows, though they shipped it anyway.
I love the touch bar on my M2 and I'm sad that more software isn't aware of it.
In my own applications I often put common functions on the touch bar and I like the convenience of it in that way.
I think most people simply don't use the F-keys much so it's not usually that big of a problem.
> Apple is now due to release Macs with proper touch on them.
I'll believe this one when I see it. "The Year of the Touchscreen Mac" has been confidently predicted for almost as long as "The Year of the Linux Desktop."
> It removed the physical function keys, which is a huge no-no overall.
Is it? Really? I'd wager most touch bar users never used the F keys and use the volume, media playback, and screen brightness mapping instead.
Inb4 it says "pro" on the lid