logoalt Hacker News

VorpalWaytoday at 7:49 AM2 repliesview on HN

There is another option than individuals vs corporations though: The government could and should provide for it's citizens. That is what a welfare state is all about: useing the taxes it collects from its citizens for the common good.

I know, to the US centric crowd at HN that probably sounds insane, but as a Scandinavian this is what I would have expected in the past (though probably not these days).


Replies

lukantoday at 10:43 AM

"useing the taxes it collects from its citizens for the common good."

Not just taxes, §14 of the german basic law for example says:

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_14.html

Any property that is needed for the benefit of all (and where there is no alternative way to buy it normally etc) can be taken and redistributed.

So like a storehouse full of food, with a starving population and broken infrastructure - can be just taken and later compensated not with wartime prices, but "normal" ones. And I believe there are at least in theory some plans for that, which military trucks go to which warehouse and what are distribution centers etc.

roenxitoday at 8:02 AM

I mean sure but if we're just going to give people the money to buy food what is the complaint about big corporations charging more?

It isn't like anyone would be unable to afford food, because a welfare state would imply a standing agreement to buy everyone food at the taxpayer's expense if required. And it is entirely reasonable for prices to go up when there is a shortage, the people who built up stockpiles in advance need to be compensated for their foresight. Someone has to be stockpiling food.

show 3 replies