> The first example was flagged by users. It fits the pattern of other political clickbait stories.
That’s what they mean. It’s too easy to flag something here, as it is too easy to downvote.
And yet submissions don't get flagged nearly as much as ought to happen.
... if you post downvotable stuff. Maybe post less crap and more high quality thoughtful content?
>That’s what they mean. It’s too easy to flag something here
He didn’t say that at all. He said there was bias towards removing negative AI posts. He showed no knowledge of the flagging system and that it could just be working as intended.