logoalt Hacker News

pianopatrickyesterday at 10:58 PM3 repliesview on HN

You could also have "zero homeless" if you had a certain amount of cheap housing that even drug addicts and mentally ill people could afford. Or where the cost of helping them is not too much.

Like some housing that was built to be closer to "indestructible" than "nice" and was small, like 200 - 300 sq ft.


Replies

layer8today at 12:38 AM

Some homeless people choose to not make use of such facilities, for example because they don’t want to get into fights with the other (ex-)homeless living there, or because of anxiety issues and the like.

show 1 reply
NoMoreNicksLefttoday at 4:57 AM

>if you had a certain amount of cheap housing that even drug addicts and mentally ill people could afford.

That was absolutely free, $0?

>Like some housing that was built to be closer to "indestructible" than "nice" and was small, like 200 - 300 sq ft.

We already have those housing units. They have concrete "beds", toilet-sink combos made out of stainless steel, and a thick steel door that can't be burned by arson. Nothing flammable is allowed within them (save the non-homeless person). The technology exists, and the homeless are actually welcome there. People get mad when they are homed thus, though.

show 1 reply
bethekidyouwanttoday at 12:18 AM

If it’s not in the city centre it will remain empty and if it is it will already be full

show 1 reply