Better would be a got vet check.
I understand the need not to break existing code that might have such fields.
I think that's a no-go because vet checks have no-false-positive policy. Ie, when go vet flags something, its a bug.
alt Hacker News
I think that's a no-go because vet checks have no-false-positive policy. Ie, when go vet flags something, its a bug.