logoalt Hacker News

floathubtoday at 12:19 PM7 repliesview on HN

According to the article, he was actually using GrapheneOS and gave the border official the Duress PIN. So I guess technically it was the official that erased the data :-)


Replies

victorbjorklundtoday at 8:02 PM

Not how the law works. If I put a bomb in a box. It will explode if a certain pin is put in. And you ask ”can I open the box? What is the pin?” And I say ”here is the pin to open it” and the bomb explodes. Do you think I can claim they blew up themselves ?

show 2 replies
jbird99today at 8:02 PM

A better feature would be a 2nd PIN that unlocks the phone to a secondary profile, which you would leave pretty bare for situations like these.

spacebanana7today at 12:50 PM

I wonder whether it'd be better for a duress PIN to delete existing data and also create a semi plausible artificial profile to hide the deletion event.

show 4 replies
dkgatoday at 7:13 PM

Interesting. So is this GrapheneOS indeed operationally good for keeping one‘s data private?

show 2 replies
nkrisctoday at 12:55 PM

I don’t think that would fly as a defense in court.

show 2 replies
OutOfHeretoday at 1:54 PM

No, to my knowledge, they ask you to enter your PIN/password yourself. They don't enter it for you. I believe he entered it himself, at which point the erasure began. The erasure process was witnessed by the officer.

show 2 replies
grueztoday at 12:31 PM

[flagged]

show 2 replies