There were A16z articles I remember reading and being better off for. This… I struggle to… separate the managerial crack from what insights remains of a field of engineering.

It isn’t helped that at random sections it feels like I’m reading Claude speak. Every instance of which the article is better off by its excision.

The combination of statements that sound like voodoo, followed by the articulation of something obvious (“you need to have a way to encode what good is.”), is disheartening to say the least.

At one point I wondered if this article was actually being subversive; attempting to bring back rationality by stating the need for Loops to be constrained by economic limits

> “ The missing piece is boring yet necessary: cost per iteration, progress per dollar, a curve someone can see while the loop is still running.”

Where engineering used to be, a religion seems to be standing. Opinion and positions instead of measurement and clarity.