logoalt Hacker News

anilakartoday at 9:10 AM4 repliesview on HN

We had CRT displays that could easily do 100 to 120 Hz. Then we regessed to LCD panels that could do 60 Hz and it somehow became the performance target.


Replies

inigyoutoday at 12:46 PM

Now that you mention it, 60Hz was considered poor on a CRT. 85 was the target.

But that was because of flicker. AFAIK, 60Hz video frame rate was considered acceptable, but on a CRT the video frame rate was also the flicker rate and 60Hz was too low for flicker.

show 2 replies
aitchnyutoday at 10:57 AM

Had a Samtron 15" and the LCD that replaced it was very washed out. Commercial users in India kept them for 15+ years.

Avicebrontoday at 9:16 AM

I mean CRT is inherently bulky, it's hard not to see why LCD panels became popular.

show 2 replies
TiredOfLifetoday at 12:44 PM

After 15 minutes at crt my eyes were watering, not so for lcd