alt Hacker NewsNice to see the capabilities of the model but the article has heavy AI tones, making it boring to read.
an AI:DR; is enough: the models found unpatched vulnerabilities and managed to create an exploit to root the tablet, chinese models did it while American ones fell back to their safeguards.
Replies
Definitely AI written, and it has an annoying bubbly vibe, but the content was interesting nevertheless.
I think those who don't see it as AI just don't read AI text several hours per day, like some of us.
I read the entire article, I love it. Nothing boring about it.
I disagree. It was a good read.
I agree. Imo the red flags start when glancing at the section headings (before I started to read the content)
> AI:DR
For those who missed it from a week ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49336573
I'm not getting that from it. Although I bet I would, if I started out presuming it's AI and let confirmation bias do the rest.
"Managed to root" the tablet is enough
The numerical fixation right in the title was a dead giveaway.
Picked up the AI vibes as well. Don't mind. Content was there.
Yep, heavy AI tone. For me was very interesting and not boring. I'm really hate reading AI when no real information is added, but when it takes you step by step to understand, it's my best tool so far to really understand things.
[flagged]
[flagged]
Ignore the message because you don't like the _perceived_ messenger.
Don't know what you're talking about, the article is good. Yes, they used ai, but this is what ai SHOULD be used for. AI should be used for either very small projects that nobody wants to do or very extreme missions that could take months.
At this point it’s more exhausting to discuss whether an article was written using AI than it is to accidentally read an article written by AI.
The article was fine. And I totally expect the kind of person spending $200 to viberoot a tablet to write their article using AI. It is what it is.