logoalt Hacker News

kemotepyesterday at 5:32 PM6 repliesview on HN

It’s hard to imagine that Cocoa Beach/Titusville isn’t receptive to this. I guess it’s probably cheaper? They don’t have to share the airspace with NASA and other launch companies and it becomes a fully owned and operated Freeport for Musk’s ventures.


Replies

chasd00yesterday at 5:40 PM

> I guess it’s probably cheaper?

State of Louisiana was probably on their hands and knees begging. The construction would last decades and anyone with a strong back that can be told what to do and do it will have a job. It would help lift a lot of people in that area out of poverty.

logistically, i wonder how long it takes to ship from Starbase Texas to Louisiana via barge. It has to be easier to get Starships to Louisiana than the East side of Florida.

show 2 replies
checkeryesterday at 5:42 PM

No expert - but from what I've heard, Florida and Texas are constrained for efficent polar (North/South) orbit launches due to restrictions over populated areas. Whereas Louisiana has the Gulf to the south so no/fewer restrictions to worry about.

show 1 reply
Tuna-Fishyesterday at 5:59 PM

They want to launch to sun-synchronous.

beerandtyesterday at 5:43 PM

There's also a due south launch path at play.

jauntywundrkindyesterday at 5:36 PM

Seems geography constrained. There's wetlands sure but how much they re allowed to build that out, vs LA where any effort to keep the state from shrinking as it does seems fairly welcome.

UltraSaneyesterday at 6:12 PM

I expect Musk picked Louisiana because it has some of the weakest corporate regulations of any state and will probably let SpaceX get away with almost anything.