Strictly speaking, the first city cost a whole lot of money, the second was basically free, through the magic of not amortizing the cost of R&D to win an online argument.
It's my understanding that the two bombs used were not the same technology so you can't just amortize the whole research costs from one to the other.
win?
Moreover, what's the argument here as you see it?
It's my understanding that the two bombs used were not the same technology so you can't just amortize the whole research costs from one to the other.