logoalt Hacker News

Trade (and Tariffs)

490 pointsby throw0101dyesterday at 1:49 PM241 commentsview on HN

Comments

dvhyesterday at 5:49 PM

Alt text: "You legs may have a comparative advantage at running, but we arms have a competitive advantage at swinging hammers, so unless you accept that we're the dominant limbs and stop hogging the oxygen, that running advantage won't be around for long."

show 1 reply
cma256yesterday at 8:12 PM

This is hilarious and I agree.

I think an under-appreciated aspect of all this is the complete schadenfreude from everyone. The story goes tariffs only hurt yourself but then we see retaliatory tariffs in response. "Oh yeah I'm going to cut off my leg to show you whose boss!" Very funny.

And then you have people predisposed to higher-taxes who are contorting themselves over the economic cost of this tax while supporting significantly more economically destructive tax policies. Very funny.

And, of course, the opposite. Republicans in my state are campaigning on lowering taxes and inflation while also defending tariffs! Very funny.

show 2 replies
otyesterday at 2:04 PM

Reference to Aesop's fable?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Belly_and_the_Members

show 1 reply
smallmancontrovyesterday at 3:16 PM

A current account deficit is a capital account surplus. Persistent deficits shift the balance between Asset vs Export sectors, dumping the export sector and pumping the asset sector. Put differently, we can pay for imports with shit that we make or shit that we own -- and this has implications for people in our country who make shit vs own shit.

A better analogy for the trade deficit would be sitting on the couch slamming potato chips and observing the shift in our body away from muscles and towards fatty tissue. Should we be excited to see this example of specialization in action? Is it wrong to want to fix our diet and push our body composition in the opposite direction?

https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300261448/trade-wars-are...

show 7 replies
daft_pinkyesterday at 8:57 PM

i'm a little bit confused by the current news. I thought the supreme court said the tariffs are illegal without congressional approval and the government started refunding the money.

now the news is full of all these tarriffs about canada?

What's the factual non-partisan reasoning by which trump has been found not to have the power to create tarriffs, but is still doing it with canada?

show 4 replies
phony-accountyesterday at 2:16 PM

To make the analogy even more perfect, the character should be holding a saw rather than a hammer.

show 1 reply
kemayoyesterday at 3:09 PM

The context here is that president Trump has an interesting view of trade deficits / surpluses. Specifically, he frequently cites cases where the US has a trade deficit with another country -- where the US is spending more in that country than that country is in the US -- as if that country is "taking money" from the US.

This is a bit peculiar, because it ignores the whole "the money we are spending is being exchanged for goods that come back to the US" part of the trade. I.e. it's not a problem that I have a "trade deficit" with the grocery store, because I have my groceries.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/trump-brag...

show 4 replies
zahlmanyesterday at 7:22 PM

If tariffs are so obviously and universally bad, then why do tariffed countries respond with retaliatory tariffs instead of letting the first country shoot themselves in the foot and getting on with their own business?

show 3 replies
getnormalityyesterday at 8:26 PM

Doesn't feel realistic. The comic version at least makes sense at some level; the real-world one doesn't.

The real world version is "they're ripping us off by giving us cheap stuff that our producers can't compete with on price." Which is arguably a problem, yes, but the one thing it's not is a "ripping us off" problem.

show 1 reply
fsckboytoday at 2:19 AM

>You legs may have a comparative advantage at running

that's not what comparative advantage means except in a degenerate sense.

if country A is worse than country B in both making clothes and making paper, their comparative advantage is in the product which they are less worse at; they can maximize their GDP making that product.

AnimalMuppetyesterday at 2:11 PM

I think a lesson is going to be taught, all right.

Unfortunately the feedback loop in nations is much slower than in bodies.

show 1 reply
DoctorOetkeryesterday at 5:53 PM

this ignores evolution theory: the cells in the leg, arm, brain, etc. share the exact same genome variation, so selection pressure rewards coherent action in the interest of the individual organism.

thats not true for different players in some level-or-not playing field

show 1 reply
Velocifyer-Untryesterday at 6:27 PM

See the explainxkcd explanation: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3290:_Trade

thunderbongyesterday at 7:13 PM

Mobile version

https://m.xkcd.com/3290/

oceanplexianyesterday at 9:19 PM

Please explain why tariffs a "good thing" to protect a French winery but a "Bad thing" when it is used to protect an American worker.

Everyone loves the EU and Canada and their tariffs. In Canada for example American poultry and dairy have as much as 200-500% tariffs. Usually it is seen as a big win to prevent undercutting the working class with cheap foreign labor. But as soon as it has any association with Trump all of a sudden the Progressives forget everything they believe in and turn into laissez faire libertarian capitalists.

show 4 replies
Velocifyer-Untryesterday at 6:24 PM

[dead]

catigulayesterday at 5:23 PM

Expert economists working in both the Biden and Trump administration support tariffs.

The difference is the dumb way Trump is doing them and a smarter way of doing them.

Obviously, this comic completely misses that nuance and promotes a pseudoscientific idea that tariffs are somehow bad.

show 4 replies
0xyyesterday at 3:16 PM

People are very quick to make kneejerk reactions to tariffs while assuming the other guys have different opinions.

The Biden admin went after Canada repeatedly for unfair trade practices, and issued a blanket 10% tariff on Chinese goods.

The only difference is to what degree they wield the tariff hammer, and in which direction it is swung.

The one thing the current admin does have a point on is non-tariff meddling. Numerous countries make it almost impossible to sell goods in their countries while the same is not true in reverse, or they levy a high price in garbage regulatory fees (see the EU's new packaging identification directive that completely destroys small business), or in completely made-up fines for vague behaviors not even they can define (see the EU's DSA which is exclusively used against monopolizing American companies while completely ignoring monopolist and predatory EU ones like Booking.com).

show 8 replies
aliasxneoyesterday at 3:04 PM

Tariffs are bad. Unless you're not the US.

show 4 replies
apexalphayesterday at 2:44 PM

This is a pretty reductive take. If a nation works 6 days a week, 12 hours a shift then obviously they will outcompete any nation where people work 5 days a week for 8 hours.

Protecting workers from that kind of competition seems fair. Tariffs aren't bad in itself. They are just a tool.

Unfortunately fools wielding a tool like this can cause a lot of damage, but that's true for any tool.

show 11 replies
CGMthrowawayyesterday at 3:24 PM

I totally agree trade should feel fair. If the US sends jobs, money, food or goods to other countries, then we shouldn't get garbage back.

Tariffs are a way of warning other countries "don’t take us for a ride." They help American workers, factories and towns that were hurt when jobs went overseas.

Tariffs shouldn't feel like hurting yourself for no reason. They are an important tool for standing up for yourself when other countries (to say nothing of bad trade deals) want to take advantage of you

show 4 replies