logoalt Hacker News

fc417fc802yesterday at 5:59 PM2 repliesview on HN

Burn it? With all the talk of carbon capture? Recall that plastic literally consists of a mass of hydrocarbons. Why not bury it?


Replies

axusyesterday at 7:34 PM

I think the legitimate answer was groundwater contamination, but that should be solved for other things we bury. I'm on board for non-biodegradable plastic trash sequestration

hktyesterday at 8:50 PM

I'd argue that if we are burning plastics we get to dodge microplastics, and we get a second use of hydrocarbons. Burn enough plastic, maybe we can displace some gas. Optimistic, I realise.

show 1 reply