I use AI all the time for coding, but a tool that non-deterministically reaches potentially a different output than I would have produced myself is not analogous to typewriters.

That's a terrible analogy. It's more like using a typewriter where the job is calligraphy.

I use LLMs at work all the time, and it truly does feel like somebody else coding for me, and me reviewing, cleaning up, and asking for changes. It's really not my work, nor is it my code, but I'm still fine bringing it in.

I also don't use LLMs on my personal code done in my free time because I want my brain to still be fully functional in a few years.

I think it's pretty telling that the only response techbros have to that is some form of false equivalence, every single time.

If you can't see why your analogy is deeply broken I honestly don't know what to do for you.