logoalt Hacker News

kulahanyesterday at 9:36 PM4 repliesview on HN

Both figuratively and literally, this experience was the tip of the iceberg. Terrifying. People might think I'm crazy, but I'm choosing my retirement location 100% based on resistance to climate change. Local water, too much humidity for massive fires, too cold for insane heatwaves... you get it.


Replies

hodgesrmtoday at 2:55 AM

Pro tip for people moving north; don't buy land in the valleys around Mt. Rainier. This type of flood (also known as a lahar) has occurred there many times. The mudflows reached the harbor of Tacoma in the past. [0] I expect we'll see at least one new one in our lifetime, as the glaciers have been greatly affected by rising temperatures.

[0] https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/mt-rainier-lahar-hazard-ma...

show 1 reply
ferguess_kyesterday at 10:05 PM

Which places have you found? I'm in Canada and figured most of the places are going to suffer more rain falling in the next decades.

show 4 replies
UncleOxidantyesterday at 11:08 PM

I've seen recommendations for locations near the Great Lakes. Upper peninsula of MI, for example. Plenty of water. A warming climate should actually make the winters there somewhat less harsh.

show 2 replies
blondie9xyesterday at 10:29 PM

Honestly there is no safe haven while humans over-consume continue to waste in the chase of excess. We have seen in the last few years all the supposed climate safe areas get hit hard.

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/09/nx-s1-5137024/climate-haven-h...

show 1 reply