alt Hacker NewsIt's neither an explanation nor a tautology; it's an element of US law.
Replies
jijijijij • yesterday at 8:16 PM
So if those prior sentences or yours are not related, your argument is part wrong, part irrelevant/nonsensical. Good talk.
It's neither an explanation nor a tautology; it's an element of US law.
So if those prior sentences or yours are not related, your argument is part wrong, part irrelevant/nonsensical. Good talk.
It was clearly written as an explanation. The alternative is that you didn't intend for the words you wrote to have any meaning, in which case why did you write them?