logoalt Hacker News

13415yesterday at 12:13 PM3 repliesview on HN

I don't consider that sensible at all. The law is supposed to protect children. It's hypocritical to exempt certain operating systems from the law, and, to be honest, I'm astonished this is legal/constitutional in California.


Replies

gspryesterday at 4:14 PM

Of course the underlying law is idiotic.

What I meant is that if we take the law as a given, then the exemption we are discussing here are very good and sensible. I wish they weren't needed, but given that they are, the language seems sensible.

show 1 reply
iamnothereyesterday at 12:42 PM

The law didn’t protect children before, and it continues to not protect children now, so there’s no change.

This law was never going to succeed at those aims.

SoftTalkeryesterday at 12:41 PM

Agree, I think the law will be challenged on that basis, and ultimately thrown out. Millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, when they could have been actually solving the problem by making platforms responsible for the content they distribute.