> Not a fork,
I guess you know you're wrong because why else would you need this bizarre requirement?
Because otherwise you can git clone Firefox , change it's name and call it a new browser.
I guess if we really get technical we could say you can fork, but need to independently implement updates going forward.
Because otherwise you can git clone Firefox , change it's name and call it a new browser.
I guess if we really get technical we could say you can fork, but need to independently implement updates going forward.