logoalt Hacker News

segmondyyesterday at 1:55 PM8 repliesview on HN

There are so models that beats all of Mistral models, plus you can run many of them locally. Why would anyone run Mistral?


Replies

villishyesterday at 2:27 PM

To have at least a choice of using a European trained model. Downloadable weights is not open source. Mistral is able to respond to any regulatory queries about training data and concerns.

show 2 replies
jnurmineyesterday at 2:22 PM

To be honest, I have a hard time noticing differences with Claude (in Kiro) and Mistral Vibe, at least with what I use them for. They simply feel like talking to the exact same thing.

icantevenholdyesterday at 4:44 PM

Mistral OCR is really good and their small models are great for simple translations, I use them regularly.

Of course I’m not always on the most bleeding edge forefront of the latest hyped model so there might be better alternatives, but I’m happy with what they provide

show 1 reply
redox99yesterday at 5:10 PM

Qwen 3.8 27B absolutely demolishes Mistral best offerings at coding, and you only need a 5090 or 2x3090 to run it.

show 1 reply
KPGv2yesterday at 2:08 PM

Possibly because Mistral is a French-based company, so EU companies can cut the American umbilical cord a bit more.

show 1 reply
perks_12yesterday at 2:22 PM

The OCR stuff is quite usable. Their models perform good at some very basic tasks, so I use them to diversify. But their current model lineup is really terrible.

bossyTeacheryesterday at 5:56 PM

Sovereignty. Not everything is about performance.

bossyTeacheryesterday at 5:56 PM

Sovereignty.