logoalt Hacker News

maz1byesterday at 2:08 PM3 repliesview on HN

I could be mistaken, but wasn't Mistral openly championing themselves as a company and EU option that wouldn't do this/didn't do this?


Replies

whizzteryesterday at 2:12 PM

Maybe they realized that they were falling behind too much? To me it seems like user-feedback on bad descisions by the AI once it's trained to a basic level is among the most important signals in tuning the model to perform better.

show 1 reply
mhitzayesterday at 3:16 PM

You must have not been keeping up with the times :)

Their big play this year was to write a "whitepaper" on the future state of EU economy, which is something that they'd like to hand of to EU leaders and part of that proposal was some kind of mandatory 10% sovereign AI spend, or some other nonsense like that.

They are, at least, trying to make big enterprise (with tailored models, custom integration) and government policy plays.

That just goes to show you how ineffective they are as well at making AI click as a usecase.

And when they don't get ahead by their own terms they copy what they see ongoing with US AI labs. Le Chat, and Vibe.

dwedgeyesterday at 5:29 PM

The same mistral that has a patent for "code implemented tool calls"https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49243397#49243588 and said "Companies selling artificial intelligence models in Europe should pay a "levy" to support cultural industries".

They seem to get a lot of slack just because they're European but every new article I see about them makes my opinion a little worse