alt Hacker News> They can be abrasive all they want. People who are wrong still need to sit down and listen instead of spitefully "burning bridges".
While I wish that were how humans work, it definitely is not. You can make the strongest argument ever and still lose if you deliver it in a way that the listener can't process it because you're triggering emotions. The best arguments IME are factual and respectful.
The best thing about being right is it doesn't matter if the listeners can process it, you're still right.
There are consequences to ignoring GrapheneOS developers. Insecure phones can get people killed.
The best arguments are respectful and measured, but few things in this world are ideal. It's in your best interests to tolerate any perceived "abrasiveness". Ignore the the guys who make Cellebrite sweat at your own peril.