> at least they care about their users
No, users are secondary to the mission. If they happen to overlap, that's a happy coincidence. And caring for a user stops if Daniel has the slightest interpretation of their comments being an attack (i.e. any mild criticism or disagreement about direction)
They care about their mission and Daniel's stance first and foremost
I wouldn't be surprised if this comment is branded an attack
> If they happen to overlap, that's a happy coincidence.
I can't know what the developers of any OS are actually thinking, but based their actions, GrapheneOS does more for their users than any other OS.
Therefore I assume that doing good things for users equals care for users. It's probably stupid to try to guess about care.