alt Hacker NewsYou're not answering the question.
When somebody says that colleague is "really good", it's a good judgement signal for me.
Replies
I may miss some context because the GP’s link has a paywall. But Altman said, "Let’s say we make an AI that’s really good". What is that supposed to mean? Really good relative to what? Current models are "really good" in many ways but nowhere near AGI. Really good compared to an average human? At everything? We’re talking about AGI, so "it’s a really good programmer/coworker/whatever" is a necessary but nowhere near sufficient condition, obviously. But given the constraints of LLMs, we can cut them some slack and only demand they be human-equivalent at digital tasks rather than walking and cooking. Still, being "really good" at all that seems to me really difficult to measure. But it’s a sufficient but not necessary condition anyway, AGI just means equivalent to human, not equivalent to a really smart human. So I really do wonder what Altman meant there if anything.
Learn, adapt and is capable of admitting mistakes & fixing it without addition input. Something AI is not capable.
Even today Claude was not able to dig deep and try other ways to do what it suppose to do for me. It was constantly "I gave up"