logoalt Hacker News

rhelztoday at 1:48 AM2 repliesview on HN

// why limit your article's impact //

Because...science? It's not science until it passes peer review.

I'm not advocating that everybody stops posting to arXiv, and I'm not saying you can't find good stuff there. I'm just saying, it's a vanity press, there is absolutely no guarantee of the paper's quality.

And being published by a famous professor from a prestigious university is also no guarantee. If we've learned anything from the non-reproducibility crisis, it is that a paper's origin story is no guarantee.


Replies

Xmd5atoday at 9:27 AM

> It's not science until it passes peer review.

You mean Robert Maxwell's quasi-monopoly on scientific publications ?

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-b...

anon48293today at 5:36 AM

Then again neither is peer review. Reproducing research is the only way to prove reproducibility and thereby lend credibility to the claims.