The idea has been kicking around for a while because it's superficially appealing.
Benefits:
- you can store huge amounts of energy in relatively cheap tanks
- because the + and - storage are physically separate, self discharge can be very low
- those two make it appealing for long term storage
Downsides:
- reagents end up being some combination of expensive (vanadium), poisonous, corrosive, etc. resulting in safety overhead
- requires specialized plumbing. This is very expensive. Ultimately this is the issue with nuclear as well, every joint requires careful inspection
- does not scale down nicely to house sizes
- ultimately likely to get economically lapped by incremental improvements to lithium or sodium battery chemistry
- the charge/discharge cell requires a liquid/liquid membrane separator which can exchange charge; these tend to have lifetime issues.
I’ve been sending these guys $10 a month for a while now. Thir test cell is chemistry agnostic, and I think they have tried several ferrous solutions. The membrane issue is not that big of a deal it seems if you aren’t trying to miniaturize the device- separator material used in car batteries can be used to good effect and it’s easy to replace if needed.
https://fbrc.dev/