logoalt Hacker News

10xDevyesterday at 6:06 PM5 repliesview on HN

Compute will always be the bottleneck even if this were true.


Replies

hgoelyesterday at 8:08 PM

As a statement of fact divorced from context, this is of course true, but it's worth putting it in context of what small-medium scale models have been achieving recently. Many of the most recent releases from Chinese labs are almost on par with trillion parameter models from less than a year ago (edit: despite being small enough to usably run on prosumer hardware). It seems clear parameter efficiency can still be improved dramatically.

In which case, maybe we don't need as much compute as we might expect. I hesitate to say "to reach a singularity" because it's kind of hard to define how that works out. Even intelligence probably hits some scaling limits eventually (e.g. speed of light related restrictions on how far it can scale, or how quickly it can expand).

Fordecyesterday at 6:55 PM

If humans can figure out to optimize to circumvent bottlenecks, I have no doubt each new bottleneck will also get routed around, just now automated.

show 3 replies
monster_truckyesterday at 7:52 PM

Based on the leaps in local inference speed in the past month, which have been absurd, I'm p confident we're going to whiplash from compute constrained to storage constrained.

Bit apples to oranges, but it reminds me of all the fiber we installed in the late 90s, certain that per-strand capacity increases were years or decades out, only to get massively rugged

show 1 reply
Miner49eryesterday at 6:12 PM

Eventually recursive self-improvement includes reducing bottlenecks.

show 2 replies
lijokyesterday at 8:51 PM

And the goalposts move again