logoalt Hacker News

dgellowyesterday at 2:24 PM6 repliesview on HN

> Like any economic model, this one has limits. For example, we did not include scenarios where humanity develops hyper-capable robots.

I didn’t see the scenario “what if we (Anthropic) are wrong about the value of AI”. Which IMHO is the most important one to consider given it is the blind spot pretty much all the AI labs have. What if the economic impact is negative? I don’t understand how you can study such a topic without considering the risk of being wrong, not in magnitude but in kind.


Replies

wing-_-nutsyesterday at 2:32 PM

I have no doubt that AI will massively transform society. That cat is out of the bag. It took decades for electricity, and then computers to change society, but this is the first technology where the average person can simply describe the problem they're trying to solve and it will at least attempt to help them solve it.

I very. much. doubt. that the trillions of dollars spent on AI will have a positive ROI for most companies in the race. It's all well and good to have the latest fable, but if some chinese company is hosting a cheap open weights model that's only 6mo behind at a tiny fraction of the price, you're gonna get your lunch eaten.

show 3 replies
Hansappreciatoryesterday at 2:33 PM

These aren't genuine studies, but are instead marketing materials that resemble studies.

show 1 reply
pllbnktoday at 9:24 AM

I think the main limit of their model is that it was prompted and with LLMs you get what you prompt for. It's as truthful as any complex models. Could be good, could be bad, could be meh.

throw10920yesterday at 2:33 PM

Wrong in the sense that it has less of an impact than they are claiming (e.g. "AI is in an overvalued hype bubble") or less (AI is going to be even more transformative than the hypers say)?

In the former case, isn't it just business as usual? (well, with a huge, nasty recession - but the economy at least continues on in some recognizable form)

It makes sense to me to focus on weird possible futures if we already have the "happy path" somewhat known and barely under control.

show 1 reply
Dlemloyesterday at 2:52 PM

Based on the current quality of AI/LLMs, this a very weird take tbh?

What are your points?

The value of AI is real and AI already is responsible for people getting fired or no additional jobs.

Ask basic graphics designers, website developers and co. Ask educational book writers or developer advocates.

show 2 replies
lp0_on_fireyesterday at 2:31 PM

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."