logoalt Hacker News

snailmailmanyesterday at 6:13 PM6 repliesview on HN

Interesting that there seems to be no FaceID? They only mentioned TouchID. I assume it’s a limitation of the under-screen camera.

They’ve been doing Touch ID instead of faceID with some of their products a few times, I think some of the iPad models? but unfortunately touchID has like a 20% success rate with my fingers. FaceID works 100% of the time for me. I’ve never had good luck with any fingerprint scanners. I hope they can someday solve the issues with FaceID under the screen.

I wasn’t going to buy this product anyway. My current phone works and I have zero reason to upgrade. But if I was in the market, no facial recognition is honestly a dealbreaker.


Replies

wpmyesterday at 6:17 PM

Hard agree but only because I think TouchID on the sleep/wake button sucks. The home button-less design and gestures introduced on the iPhone X were obviously designed in tandem and only work with FaceID. I have Touch ID disabled on all of my devices that have it because it's so damn annoying now.

nozzlegearyesterday at 6:16 PM

I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure they mentioned both Face ID and Touch ID in the stream. They wanted to add Touch ID because of the various angles people might use the phones with. Also mentioned that it'll unlock with your Apple Watch, like the Mac does right now.

nunezyesterday at 6:18 PM

I _much_ prefer Touch ID. Always hated Face ID.

show 1 reply
rootusrootusyesterday at 6:14 PM

They need to just do both, honestly, whenever possible. Both methods have legions of fans and detractors.

Klonoaryesterday at 6:33 PM

I am happy that I will have managed to completely skip the requirement to use FaceID.

m3kw9yesterday at 6:18 PM

prob tech and UX issue. FaceID can't do side ways, and people opens side ways half the time. Maybe there are also functions unlockable wihtout clamshell opening. can't put 5 faceID on each side and facing every which way.

show 1 reply