logoalt Hacker News

robnertoday at 12:58 AM5 repliesview on HN

In the Netherlands were I live we use trains for this


Replies

uv-depressiontoday at 1:08 AM

Yeah, most places other than the US do. Good public transit is a far, far better solution than better cars. Elsewhere in the thread people are talking about ways of convincing drunk people to get their cars to drive them, and don't seem to realize the fact that people drive to go drink is terrifying! At this point it's deeply set in US "common sense" (to the point where in many places, bars have mandatory parking minimums!) and will take a lot of work to unwind. Fortunately there's progress, like in NYC and Seattle.

show 4 replies
int0x29today at 3:56 AM

This is great until your city was built by a 50s urban planner. Past a certain amount of sprawl building functioning public transit becomes nearly impossible. LA and Santa Clara County come to mind here. LA can sort of work if you are on the metro and don't need transfers.

I kinda wish some day some dark wizard curses those two areas to lose 75% of their roads and parking lots and make everything a lot closer.

SEJefftoday at 1:05 AM

The US is ~263x larger than the Netherlands landmass wise. It would require a loooot more trains than we have or you have.

show 4 replies
TulliusCicerotoday at 7:27 AM

Trains or bikes, really (plenty of Waymo/Uber/Lyft trips aren't super far).

himinlomaxtoday at 8:05 AM

A 2h train ride is not a problem, but what is is the trip to and from the stations.

A 2h autonomous car ride removes that entirely.

show 1 reply