logoalt Hacker News

tossandthrowtoday at 8:03 AM2 repliesview on HN

A better idea would just be to let drivers pay the real price for the infrastructure they occupy and their negative externalities.

Then people would likely not have a issue with public transit.


Replies

mrngldtoday at 11:19 AM

The negative externalities? On net the benefits are enormously positive, which is why every community around the world down to the very poorest, even illiterate societies (ancient civs were mostly illiterate and still built extensive road networks) will start clearing paths to make transport easier. It's an enormous social net benefit, the free, fast, efficient movement of people from one point of their choosing to another.

show 1 reply
rrr_oh_mantoday at 10:36 AM

"Let's make car owners more miserable" is a typical sentiment held by young, healthy people who live in dense cities and ride an electric bicycle to work.

Not everyone can do that. Many areas also completely lack the public transit infrastructure needed to support a normal life.

E.g., a couple of days ago, I was shocked to learn just how bad the UK public transport system really is, apparently, outside of major metros (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49445286)

show 1 reply