logoalt Hacker News

sk4rekr0wyesterday at 10:16 PM5 repliesview on HN

"We can say categorically that it is impossible for Dr. Buckmaster’s Codex prompts over the last two months to have influenced the system in any way, including training."

This is the third day of total hysteria that is based on nothing of substance. Move on folks.


Replies

phyzomeyesterday at 11:09 PM

Even if that were true, they've already admitting to throwing vast quantities of resources to scoop a researcher who was about to publish (because they'd learned, somehow, of his breakthrough). If that doesn't bother you I think you need to take a step back and have a good think about this.

show 2 replies
nozzlegearyesterday at 11:13 PM

I can say categorically that OpenAI is not a credible or trustworthy company.

golly_nedtoday at 5:34 AM

Where did OpenAI say this?

And it still leaves open the question of the prompt itself, which can just as easily encode information about the same knowledge.

soundworldstoday at 12:41 AM

Regardless, they started working on this problem after hearing that one of their customers was already working on it. It almost doesn't matter about the training data. This is the provider you are paying undermining your career.

suddenlybananasyesterday at 10:18 PM

Why should we trust them?

show 3 replies