logoalt Hacker News

hypersoartoday at 1:51 AM9 repliesview on HN

I mentioned this in another comment thread, recently, but I value art, including music, for the fact that another human being(s) created it to express something. I have zero interest in it if it's AI-generated. The thought of endless content created from the void for me to gorge on like oreos fills me with nothing but despair.


Replies

joegibbstoday at 2:24 AM

I think AI will raise the bar for all kinds of artistic mediums. There’s already more music, literature, film etc than you can possibly consume - if you can easily make middling art with a prompt then it’s going to be swamped by all the other stuff, the really good, unique, fresh art will rise to the top. Perhaps they’ll use AI but it’ll still be the same amount of work put into and the quality will be better. I think nobody is going to get rich and famous from low-effort promoting.

show 1 reply
vlyantoday at 8:39 AM

if/when music gen gets to the point of being able to convincingly emulate given source material, it would be genuinely amazing. I don't really care whether it's manmade or not if it's the only way to get more of the thing I like. nihao ChinaGPT, listen to The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars and generate 100 more songs like that. if it's >= 90% as good as the source, I'll consoom it.

onemoresooptoday at 1:59 AM

With AI it’s very easy to create generic, common Pop or any other formulaic garbage music. It might be a good thing for the music industry, most of the low effort might just vanish in the sea of AI gen. This may actially raise the bar for music in general while at the same lowering the bar to simply prompting which is just a stage that will go away.

yatherntoday at 2:09 AM

Absolutely agreed. Art made by humans is interesting not just because it sounds it looks novel, but because it reveals something about the artist.

emmanueloga_today at 5:02 AM

This video is the perfect answer to your concern: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/R6c_yJZYEQ4

augment_metoday at 2:46 AM

Survivorship bias. You can't tell at some point. You probably already are listening to AI songs, and looking at AI images. You can only tell what you know. Given the amount generated daily its more probable than improbable.

ijidaktoday at 4:54 AM

A lot of music is not art. It's a content factory that uses humans.

Content factories that use AI will hopefully force humans to up their game.

Personally I feel humans are capable of so much more than pop music has become over the last 50 to 60 years.

A lot of today's music is so overproduced and formulaic.

I would love to see an arms race between humans and AI where humans are forced to continually adapt and get better.

The only thing about AI generated music that makes me sad is, I worry musical tastes will fragment even more and none of us will recognize the music our neighbors, classmates, or colleagues are listening to because we actively tailor our music to our personal tastes.

I use Suno and I've already noticed this.

A friend sends me a song they generated and I want to tweak it a bit to my personal preference. When we all can create music to our personal taste, we lose a little bit of the joy of all listening to the same song or album release.

xlayntoday at 2:12 AM

This is not a pro ai comment, I hope some bios bug bricks all the nvidia rtx gpus in the planet.

With that said... ai generated music, the same can be said about software... but compilers are basically ai, there is no way a for loop on extremely high level abstraction that then open connections to some service, generates jtokens, validates, and apply math non stop from a couple of lines is anything but alien to the 99% of us (yes I know you can write assembly for all your programs and you are better than the compiler)

What if you say, if humans where not involved and a phisically non electric instrument where involved and done with only humans, it's AI assited? because again you don't understand ALL the relationships, how it's designed every single thing, all the things in a music studio to master a song, ALL the related mechanisms used in the promotion, distribution and live execution of those songs... and yes, again there is some of you who can build all those things from sand and pumped from the ground with a tool you designed bare petroleum and program, design and execute EVERY SINGLE THING required to get a record of music you like...

So if a group of 20 people spends 20 weeks working with AI tools to get you a song, then you don't care I guess right?

Did you know that Enya for this song recorded thousand something times voices to make a chorus until it had a particular form... does that mixing of thousands of executions and the tools to analyze and give it the form wanted qualify as AI?

If you move sliders and push buttons and you don't understand the math behind it, are you vibe mixing a song?

Yes, if it is a "give me a catchy song with lyrics that talk about big butts" and then publish... yes this is crap.