logoalt Hacker News

well_ackshuallyyesterday at 7:46 PM3 repliesview on HN

So it wasted everyone's time, thousands of hours of research trying to disprove something said very loudly. What OpenAI is doing is a DoS of the scientific community: wasting your time trying to check if they're not wrong, and claiming glory in the mean time.


Replies

tmhn2yesterday at 8:04 PM

That's true, but the story would have unfolded differently if Mochizuki had a lean-verified proof and was correct. I guess baked into my premise is that AI is producing reliable proofs (in the long term at least).

ksopedyesterday at 7:53 PM

Agreed! Although, if done by a mathematician, it's not a ~complete waste. I think the community learns something along the way.

Is there an established term for the idea of "DoS"? I've taken to calling it slop fatigue.

show 1 reply
charcircuityesterday at 10:14 PM

OpenAI avoids this by formally verifying the proof.

https://github.com/openai/NavierStokesAndEuler