logoalt Hacker News

fileartstoday at 2:09 AM1 replyview on HN

Let's say that we are "pacing the frontier", and an approved model goes and causes billions of damage, or worse, loss of life. The auditor signed off on the model, so who is to blame? Who put their akin in the game? METR did. The public did. But it seems like the lab has crafted a system in which they remain blameless.

The calculus of risk is fundamentally different when the adverse consequences are obvious and tangible.

I don't see how some federal agency or external auditor will do anything to align incentives. It just seems like a way to socialize the risk while holding onto the benefits to me.


Replies

SpicyLemonZesttoday at 2:20 AM

Again, you're presenting ideas that I just don't understand where they're coming from. Why would the lab be blameless in such a situation? You and I and METR and the public would all want the frontier labs to face adverse consequences if their products caused huge problems, so who would give them immunity and why?

show 1 reply