alt Hacker NewsWho had criminal intent here? Or are you suggesting a new crime for negligent hacking, which wouldn’t require intent from the perpetrator?
Replies
rglover • today at 1:30 PM
Whoever prompted the agent, whoever supplied the means, whoever knew but didn't say anything.
➕ show 1 reply
roosterIllusi0n • today at 1:57 PM
The CEOs. They have full control and make all the decisions. Charging anyone else would not stop anything.
➕ show 2 replies
esalman • today at 2:01 PM
‘It wasn’t us, it was a bug in the software’ used to be the defense for bad code. Then it became the defense for self-driving cars. Now it’s being used for AI cyber attacks.
dismalaf • today at 3:22 PM
[dead]
There's no need for a new crime when we already have reckless conduct, namely, "conduct that creates a substantial and unjustifiable risk of harm to others and involves a conscious disregard of, or indifference to, that risk".
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/reckless