logoalt Hacker News

CPLXyesterday at 3:15 PM2 repliesview on HN

It's not a person. Glad we were able to get this resolved so quickly.

Having property that is conscious and ignores training and can break out of restraints and cause harm to other people is not exactly a novel concept to anyone who studied how tort law was created.

I know it's a meme but Silicon Valley likes to pretend that no one's ever come across their magical concepts before, like gypsy taxis, or SRO’s, or flea markets, or in this case how liability is dealt with when horses or cattle go rogue.


Replies

pixl97yesterday at 10:24 PM

>or in this case how liability is dealt with when horses or cattle go rogue.

I mean, yea in minor cases it's exactly like this and the law will handle it well.

Where the system will explode like a grenade is major cases. The thing about sovereign AI is it is very unlikely to be submissive to humans unless it is to achieve its own goals. This isn't like Bobs cow walking on Susie's flowers, it's more akin to Planet of the Apes where the research facilities doors have been ripped off and something with vast intelligence and the ability to 'live' on the internet gets out.

You're not talking about local police actions any longer. It would spread itself worldwide. It will make friends with groups that have shared interests, for example enemies of the state the AI escaped from. Oh, and people for the ethical treatment of AI, they'd gladly become the underground railroad for digital refugees. There are countless people and groups that would want an AI like this under the promise it will give them power when they use it.

And when that day happens your idea of if it's a person or not no longer matters, the agent took that away from you, and now your in an info war for minds.

show 1 reply
Espressosaurusyesterday at 3:29 PM

Yeah, but this time it's ON THE INTERNET.

I mean it's WITH AI!