logoalt Hacker News

rbanffyyesterday at 9:36 PM3 repliesview on HN

The more dramatic contingency you have to plan for, the more expensive the plan gets.

Earlier this week I mentioned that if we lose enough data centres to bring our operation down, the first items in the to-do list becomes securing weapons, vehicles and fuel.


Replies

chasd00yesterday at 10:17 PM

> to-do list becomes securing weapons, vehicles and fuel.

I toured a datacenter once back in the early 2000s and they showed me 30 days of generator fuel storage. When i asked them why 30 days and not 35 they replied "we're such a major customer of both electricity and fuel that if we don't get electricity or fuel for 30 days there's way bigger problems than your website not being online" hah.

show 2 replies
jiggawattsyesterday at 10:08 PM

I had the same discussion with a manager about the backups of financial contracts for cleaning school facilities.

He just couldn't get past the notion that if the six copies in four buildings across two states were all simultaneously physically destroyed, then most likely there are also no more schools left standing, and hence the contracts to clean them are null and void. Also, payment is now in booze and ammunition, not dollars.

ares623yesterday at 9:46 PM

"Daddy, where were you when the flames reached our house?"

"I was in the office, reviewing Terraform plans"