logoalt Hacker News

ndriscolltoday at 2:04 AM1 replyview on HN

Why is it still active? Even an interpreter with no lookahead could see that it goes out of scope immediately when f returns (it gets shadowed on that line), so as long as there's no guarantee about when finalizers get called, it should be able to mark it dead inside of reduce as soon as it's passed to f. Like move semantics here should be a general pattern for optimization, no?


Replies

edflsafoiewqtoday at 2:12 AM

Does Python actually do that? If the f call throws, you can still observe the (unchanged) binding of acc in reduce.

show 1 reply