logoalt Hacker News

psadriyesterday at 10:47 PM3 repliesview on HN

I was in a similar situation and tried a different approach.

I had start with asking for a contact with some details I provided. But then I ask the model to be an experienced corporate lawyer and ask me a series of questions to gather the details it needed and then write the contract. The result covered a lot of details that were highly relevant but were absent from the original attempt.

The key insight is that you can lean on the model to cover your unknown unknowns.


Replies

samtpyesterday at 11:01 PM

Your comment is a great example of the phenomenon where people think AI is an expert in areas that are not because they have no way to determine if the seemingly good looking result is genius, gibberish, or somewhere in between.

show 2 replies
inopinatusyesterday at 11:50 PM

> The result covered a lot of details that were highly relevant but were absent from the original attempt

Another one suckered by the plausibility engines.

dghlsakjgyesterday at 10:51 PM

Did you validate the output with a lawyer?

show 1 reply