logoalt Hacker News

howunfortunateyesterday at 9:47 PM5 repliesview on HN

I'm curious what trends you see towards censorship?

Elon presumably being an exemplar for current trends: Twitter is unarguably far less censored than it was before (though censorship is still present). And Meta took note and also turned down its censorship significantly in response.

The Epstein files, while far less than hoped for by many, are another example of a trend towards sharing far more sensitive info than has been typical by past administrations.

There are many good examples you could point to of increased authoritarianism, but censorship in particular seems to be on the backswing, if anything.

Edit: oof, it's extremely concerning that the comment below was flagged


Replies

ACCount39yesterday at 11:43 PM

Multiple jurisdictions have tried to play the stupid games of "we'll make a dumb fuck law that creates problems for you, the website operator, and if you don't conform, we'll sinkhole you at ISP level". Platforms like Xitter and Telegram being the common early targets.

The "age verification" push is a big move in that direction in Western countries. "Think of the children" is an evergreen excuse for authoritarian measures.

geraneumyesterday at 10:09 PM

It’s too soon for such a conclusion IMO. The pervasive Iran-like censorship I was talking about will rear its ugly head when those authoritarian regimes are established. It’s a tool and I can assure you it will be used extensively. This is nothing new really.

P.S. the Epstein files were just a cruel joke! I wouldn’t list it there.

show 1 reply
bl00pertoday at 4:24 AM

We are seeing such widespread and severe (literally lethal) censorship in the U.S. that I find the discussion here jaw-dropping. Does no one on this site read the news?

This is the current lead story on the NYT.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/19/us/politics/trump-cnn-msn...

Trump banned disfavored news outlets from the White House.

He also tried to take TV stations off the air for hosting comics who made fun of him, cut funding for public broadcasters in order to "punish or suppress disfavored expression", scrubbed information from government websites, and endeavored to punish "woke" universities.

https://universityobserver.ie/silencing-late-night-censorshi...

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/31/media-broadcasting-...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_onlin...

https://apnews.com/article/harvard-trump-funding-appeal-f652...

People have been arrested for writing editorials he didn't like:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detention_of_R%C3%BCmeysa_%C3%...

Hundreds have been arrested for protesting against ICE:

https://www.democracynow.org/2026/4/21/caught_crackdown_thom...

ICE agents have murdered two protesters to date.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Ren%C3%A9e_Good

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Alex_Pretti

>Elon presumably being an exemplar for current trends

He is that: he is using lawfare to silence people criticizing X for hosting and funding white supremacists.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/x-twitter-elon-mus...

https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-media-matters-lawsuit-a...

I think hundreds of people being arrested for their protected speech is a more objectionable form of censorship than a few Twitter bans.

qerghnuitoday at 12:10 AM

>Twitter is unarguably far less censored than it was before (though censorship is still present). And Meta took note and also turned down its censorship significantly in response.

A publisher making editorial decisions is not censorship. You have no right to demand Twitter publish your speech. If you don't like their editorial policies, you are free to go elsewhere. You are not prevented from speaking or even prevented from reaching an audience. None of these platforms is a monopoly.

For my money, I would prefer to hang out somewhere where people don't openly celebrate the murder of my family. Would you deny me that right? If so, you are not on the side of freedom. I don't object to the existence of forums like /pol/ or today's Twitter; if you object to the existence of moderated forums like Twitter in its prime then you are the one restricting speech.

Today, we see flagrant examples of the literal government literally prohibiting people from speaking their minds. Literal masked thugs with literal guns are literally grabbing people off the streets. This is censorship like the Soviets did it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu3q1eYyR1A

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/19/us/politics/trump-cnn-msn...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fcc-disney-abc-early-license-re...

https://www.aclum.org/cases/ozturk-v-trump/

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2026/07/31/p...

https://www.propublica.org/article/caught-in-crackdown-ice-c...

Twitter has certainly relaxed its policies on racism and violence in recent years, and perhaps you think that's a good thing. But point out that they're paying Nazis to post about their hatred of Jews (an undisputed fact even if you object to the framing) and they'll file SLAPP suits to try to bankrupt you. They very much go in for censorship (the real kind, backed up by guys with guns) when it benefits them.

https://www.fire.org/news/fire-statement-x-corps-lawsuit-and...

show 2 replies