logoalt Hacker News

atemerevlast Sunday at 1:49 PM2 repliesview on HN

What is "intelligence" then. I think the universalism of LLMs is now evident enough that they can be considered "intelligent", even in slightly different realization compared to humans.

As of "great damage", I doubt it. They do not have self-preservation instinct (all "worrying" experiments are the attempts to initiate something resembling self-preservation from human initiative). The driving part is external - the query loop can always be turned off. So yes, a dangerous tool that can be exploited by humans (including governments, especially governments - which is why I am skeptical to government regulation proposals, particularly looking at what passes as governments in this era). But there are no inherent dangers from their own agency, as there is none.


Replies

alansaberlast Sunday at 2:42 PM

"Slightly different"- no, a completely different realisation of intelligence to humans. LLMs can definitely do cool stuff though.

show 1 reply
chrisjjyesterday at 8:11 AM

> As of "great damage", I doubt it. They do not have self-preservation instinct

The potential for great damage relies upon the lack of self-preservation instinct. That lack releases the so-called AI from an order under pain of death. Damage cannot be punished.