logoalt Hacker News

traceroute66today at 4:04 PM3 repliesview on HN

Not forgetting of course that an RTX5090 is what 600W+ ? And the Mac is probably half that at most ?


Replies

washadjeffmadtoday at 5:17 PM

Certainly not forgetting wattage. A 5090 is 575W. The M5 Ultra Studio is 480W.

nvidia-smi -pl 450 for like a 4% reduction in throughput. I tend to set it around 350W because it's a comfortable temperature blowing on my legs under the desk without warming my office in the summer.

I put together this system two years ago, so it's a little out of date, but it only cost $3000 for the same performance and capability as an Ultra. I don't think I would spend $7000 to save 100W, though.

show 1 reply
beastman82today at 4:06 PM

sure. so is 2x power worth 10x perf? I think it is in most cases.

ActorNightlytoday at 5:37 PM

When you are doing matrix math, compute is compute. Apple cant be more efficient due to physics. The only reason Macs are more efficient in general is that they have tightly bundled hw and sw for specific tasks.