logoalt Hacker News

amiga386yesterday at 8:30 AM3 repliesview on HN

They're one of the few companies that actually manage to sell "boxed software" (i.e. has not changed much in years but new customers keep buying it)

That said, Windows users should use 7-Zip. Better compression format, unpacks more kinds of archives


Replies

TonyTrappyesterday at 1:37 PM

While I also like 7z a lot and use it all the time, it's really not a better format that RAR. Higher compression ratios? Sure, marginally. But for archival RAR is still the better choice as it supports recovery records, which 7z still does not. I also found it more difficult to restore data from a partial 7z file (i.e. trailer data is missing) compared to an incomplete RAR file.

xxsyesterday at 9:05 AM

> Windows users should use 7-Zip

Please no - no native zstd support. NanaZip is the better option (it's a different build of 7-zip) and it's available at windows store.

> Better compression format, unpacks more kinds of archives

winrar has supported zstd for 5 years[0]

In short - Everyone should be using zstd, and 7-zip does not support it.

[0]: https://www.win-rar.com/singlenewsview.html?&L=0&tx_ttnews%5...

show 4 replies
gsichyesterday at 5:12 PM

but worse filebrowser