logoalt Hacker News

abtinftoday at 4:40 PM7 repliesview on HN

Astra is just so good. And the ChatGPT subscription lets me use my own harness, so I can hook it up to exe.dev.

I’ll be going about my day, have a random idea, launch a microvm on exe.dev with a prompt of my idea, and get a working thing a few minutes later.

I don’t know how much better a model would have to be to get me to move off OpenAI at this point, but doing just a little bit better in terminal bench 4 isn’t it. It would have to be a difference in kind, like opening up the harness restrictions, or privacy guarantees (comparable to offline models).

Edit to address questions below:

ChatGPT supports oauth login.

Exe.dev has it built in. IIRC, pi also has it built in via /login.


Replies

onlyrealcuzzotoday at 4:42 PM

> And the ChatGPT subscription lets me use my own harness, so I can hook it up to exe.dev.

This is news to me. Excited to try it out! Thanks.

show 1 reply
cbg0today at 5:11 PM

How about cheaper? Astra is $10 in $50 out, Opus is $4 in $20 out. Even on a subscription you'll get considerably more usage out of Opus.

show 6 replies
polalaviktoday at 4:44 PM

ya i've been a gpt hater for a while. almost exclusively used claude up until astra. astra feels like it blows everything out of the water. its fast, correct, organized, and less verbose.

show 1 reply
roughlytoday at 4:45 PM

> And the ChatGPT subscription lets me use my own harness, so I can hook it up to exe.dev.

Can you give more details here? This sounds intriguing.

show 1 reply
mlcruztoday at 5:56 PM

What worked well for me was a custom version of Open Web Ui with some customization to spawn an exe.dev instance for each new chat. I can just work on my phone, deploy stuff for development purposes on an easy to share way etc.

felixgallotoday at 4:42 PM

If you read the page, Opus is now significantly better than Astra while also being cheaper and having more performance headroom available.

show 2 replies