logoalt Hacker News

zuInnptoday at 4:55 PM6 repliesview on HN

So it Opus performs as well as Fable what is then the selling point of Fable?

All of this starts to feel more like a drug dealer selling their newest stuff.

In two weeks we probaly get Fable 5.2 with “groundbreaking” improvements, then Astra x+1 etc and then the cycle starts again.

And on the way I always have to check my tooling and need to adjust things to get max results.


Replies

orangecattoday at 5:18 PM

All of this starts to feel more like a drug dealer selling their newest stuff.

Yeah, like Apple tells me the M6 is the best chip, but just a few months ago that's what they said about the M5. What a bunch of frauds.

ieie3366today at 5:05 PM

? they will obviously release Fable 5.5 soon(tm). It's same as hardware. The previously top tier product gets obsolete

show 1 reply
glubtoday at 5:11 PM

Don't forget that Opus 5 was tracking fable on many benchmarks, yet it was borderline unusable for any coding work. My Claude sub usage has been 100% fable, 0% opus 5.

Benchmarks often don't survive contact with reality.

show 3 replies
notatoadtoday at 5:44 PM

typically, when any AI company says a model performs as well as fable, all they're really telling us is that the benchmarks that exist for measuring AI capabilities aren't very good.

giancarlostorotoday at 5:17 PM

Fable should have just been called Opus Primt for Enterprise and sold only to enterprise customers. I don't even use it. I rather just use Opus.

show 1 reply
quotemstrtoday at 5:11 PM

Big model smell is a real thing. For certain classes of problem, ones you get a feel for but can't easily articulate, a big last-gen model can get you what you're looking for when no quantity of tokens from some ultra-RLed mid-size latest generation model can.

show 1 reply