Please. The headline is clickbait, trying to imply that OpenAI somehow screwed up.
What I've said is rather clearly spelled out in the article. Consider reading the it next time?
> It did, however, unambiguously solve the problem according to the Clay Institute’s original formulation.
What I've said is rather clearly spelled out in the article. Consider reading the it next time?
> It did, however, unambiguously solve the problem according to the Clay Institute’s original formulation.