alt Hacker NewsIt seems to be exactly the opposite, a "fully human error":
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49815363
Nothing to do with AI patches at all, nor was it a bug. It was intentional human behavior, a temporary rollout setting, that seems to have made sense.
But I guess that doesn't fit the "narrative".
Replies
pasteleft • today at 7:29 PM
I don't understand what you are talking about. Vibecoding IS a human error.
q3k • today at 1:23 PM
> It seems to be exactly the opposite, a "fully human error"
"LLMize the succeses, humanize the failures." is the PR strategy at play here. Anything goes well it's because AI did it, anything goes bad it's because a human didn't catch it.
➕ show 1 reply
ndbe • today at 1:21 PM
[dead]
One thing I do know is that an Anthropic employee is definitely NOT going to blame this on the model they are using.