logoalt Hacker News

llimllib • yesterday at 1:00 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

The specific language is:

> projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools

And "mostly" here seems egregiously undefined to me

https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/commit/96fac426a32d1ba91ff...


Replies

tcfhgj • yesterday at 1:06 PM

implies for me >50% - instead of >0% as suggested by @ricardobeat

WarmWash • yesterday at 1:31 PM

The hardest part of policy isn't coming up with smart policy, it's figuring out where and how to draw the lines.

jenniferhooley • yesterday at 2:55 PM

As much as I hate vibe-coded "slop". I feel like this is idiotic. I and most good engs with decades of experience do use AI now to type nearly all the actual "code", but we read EVERY SINGLE line, always fix and rework every feature before a commit to make it clean, optimized, and de-slopified.

But still, we wouldn't be allowed to use codeberg because "generative ai" was used significantly for most lines of code?

➕ show 1 reply
mitxela • yesterday at 2:41 PM

What do you think "mostly" could mean?

➕ show 1 reply
ares623 • yesterday at 6:42 PM

> And "mostly" here seems egregiously undefined to me

and yet we seem to be convinced that English is the appropriate spec language of the modern times