In a way, this comment precisely demonstrates the kind of vitriol responses that the article talks about -- witch hunt without evidence, going with the trend, herd mentality.

Isn't this story pretty much all about jumping to conclusions and pissing on people who you don't know?

I read it and didn’t get that impression.

Perhaps you could endow your claim with some evidence.

Amused by a claim about writing composition that uses “clearly mostly” back to back.

Hmm. Pangram AI detection says the piece is “100% human written.”

Based on what?

Even if so, this would seem to be a positive use of LLMs. Something traumatic happened, and she wants to put her perspective into the public dialog rather than continuing to be a passive subject of the social media industry's two minute hate. I know in such a position I myself would be at a loss for words, with the perfect being the enemy of the good enough.

[dead]